Page 60 - KBHA BULLETIN 5
P. 60

57


                   the Silvermine Valley to Simon’s Town. (Fig. 3.28.) Council considered these proposals but

                   rejected them and on 30 April 1974 reaffirmed their existing proposals. Not satisfied with
                   this,  Ward  17  put  forward  an  alternative  Silvermine  proposal.  The  Metropolitan  Planning

                   Committee entered the fray proposing instead a single Boyes Drive carriageway coupled with
                   the upgrading of Ou Kaapse Weg.


                 Financial  implications  now  began  to  play  an  increasing  role  in  deliberations  about

                   construction: the Boyes Drive scheme ran across City Council land and would therefore be its

                   financial responsibility, but it would serve few Council residents directly because the access
                   points would be situated in Divisional Council (Westlake) and Fish Hoek Council areas. On

                   the  other  hand,  the  Silvermine  Scheme  ran  largely  through  Divisional  Council  land  and
                   implied that they would be financially responsible – but they were apparently not interested in

                   this.  Furthermore,  the  City  Council  had  certain  recreational  plans  for  their  land  in  the
                   Silvermine  Valley,  notably  a  recreational  dam  and  a  nature  reserve,  but  these  would  be

                   destroyed  by  the  Silvermine  route  and  the  money  already  expended  in  acquiring  the  land

                   would therefore be wasted. Then, Fish Hoek Municipality favoured the Silvermine route as
                   the Trappies route would consume a large area of developable rates-generating land, whereas

                   the Silvermine route would fall outside their area. The Province regarded themselves as the
                   only  authority  capable  of  affording  the  Silvermine  route  but  it  was  a  luxury  they  were

                   unwilling to support. The Provincial Executive concurred with this on 26 November 1974,
                   the main reason being the very much greater cost of the Silvermine route (R46 million) as

                   against the R22 million of the City Council’s scheme. (PRE Report to the Director of Local

                   Government, 17 September 1974.)


                 Strategic  implications  also  had  to  be  considered:  the  SA  Navy  were  not  in  favour  of  the

                   Silvermine route because of its strategic vulnerability should its two tunnels (3,9 km and 0,8
                   km) be blocked.


                 Meanwhile, metropolitan transport planning priorities had entered the equation, and towards

                   the  end  of  1975  the  City  Council  was  charged  with  drawing  up  a  larger  Metropolitan







                                                             57
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65