Page 121 - KBHA BULLETIN 3
P. 121

118

               And  in  looking  at  the  whole  situation  we  need  to  include  the  recreational  and  sports

               fishermen. We need to consider the tourist industry, the businesses and the local residents.


               Another question we should be asking is: Why after all the years of fighting against the use of

               nets in the Bay, why are we doing it ourselves? When some of the local boats had licenses to
               catch pilchards for bait these were for relatively small amounts, and the other local boats had

               access to this bait. Today there are several quotas of 300 ton being netted in False Bay. These
               belong to the quota holders and it is incorrect to say they belong to the Kalk Bay Fishermen.

               The fishermen have to pay more than R20 a box of bait at retail outlets.


               One of the major changes in the industry today is that of quotas. These have become very

               important issues and we deal with that in the book. We have pointed out that these quotas

               group fishermen together. That is not to say that these fishermen are all active in catching
               these quotas, rather they are brought  together because they benefit from the proceeds of a

               quota. We have also described how some of these quota groups overlap, how some people

               benefit  from  more  than  one  quota  while  others  are  left  out  all  together.  This  needs  to  be
               understood before any long term decisions are made about the local fishing industry.



               There have been several fishing factories in the past and they have failed for several reasons.
               Apart from internal difficulties in managing them the main reason for their demise has been

               the “lack of adequate and continuous supplies of fish”. This is not new, it is recorded, it is

               history. Any new project along such lines needs to take into account the past records and,
               more  important,  if  it  is  going  to  claim  to  be  for  the  fishermen  of  Kalk  Bay  then  it  must

               include all those who fish out of Kalk Bay. That means it must accommodate the moving

               population I described earlier and not just the boat owners but also the fishermen themselves.
               All those who make a living out of the harbour should be part of such a scheme and it should

               be  discussed  with  them.  They  should  be  allowed  their  input.  We  need  to  remember  the
               popular words in our new democracy: “transparency and public participation”. Such a scheme

               must take into account the congestion that already occurs in Kalk Bay when there are fish

               being caught. It must allow for the fact that fish will have to be brought in from somewhere
               else to keep a factory busy. I am not voicing an opinion for or against such a proposal. I am
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122