Page 110 - KBHA Bulletin 16
P. 110

107


                   129,000 and 127,000, respectively; in 1934 they rose to 211,500; in 1935: 213,500; in

                   1936:  189,500;  in  1937:  205,000;  and  during  the  three  months  of  1938  60,000  were
                   admitted.


                   The  significance  of  the  Pier  in  the  popular  mind  is  well  captured  in  the  following

                   description:


                   “In season the Pier is the popular rendezvous; evenings it is thronged. Variety concerts,
                   bioscope entertainments and band performances by the Cape Town Orchestra provide a
                   programme every night in the week, whilst holiday-makers in holiday modes and mood
                   promenade the decks, enjoying the exhilarating scene. Across the black waters at night
                   come the reflections of the City lights, broken up into thousands of glittering facets by the
                   never-ending succession of wavelets that break in from the Bay. The distant mountains,
                   dimly lined against the sky, stand out cold and stark and mysterious, but all around you is
                   brightness and vivacity; the sounds of music, and the swish of water as the waves play
                   amongst the network of piles and girders below; the smell of the salt sea as the ozone-
                   laden breeze stimulates you into consciousness that you feel the better for its blowing; all
                   these experiences and many others concomitant to the occasion enter into the weft and
                   woof of the pleasure you derive and the health-giving conviction that grows upon you.

                   Capetown without its Promenade Pier is unthinkable.”

                   The Cape of Good Hope – Being the Official Handbook of the City of Cape Town, 1926:
                   127 – 130.



                   Destruction


                   The Pier was predestined to have a short life. It had not been a financial success and some

                   even considered it a white elephant,  despite its fame.  It  then fell victim to  the greater
                   needs of three parties who since the 1890s had been involved in a “triangular wrangle”

                   over how to resolve their expansionary requirements. (That term first appeared in 1907 in

                   a report by C E McLeod titled The Table Bay Foreshore – Comprehensive Scheme.) The
                   three parties were the Harbour Board, the Railway Authorities, and the Council – and the

                   solution to all their requirements pointed in the direction of the Bay:
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115