Page 16 - Bulletin 7 2003
P. 16

13





                     interest in his subject to take such a flight as to make his understandable omissions so
                     regrettable.


                     There are three Elliott photographs of the interesting homestead of Paarl Diamant, of

                     which not a trace now remains; not one of these shows what the front looked like

                     although  the  rare  back  gable  is  well  recorded.  Presumably  it  did  not  have  a  front
                     gable, or else Elliott would have wanted to record it, but today we are interested in

                     facades even if they have no gables. Elliott left us photographs of the front of the
                     Stellenbosch ‘Burger House’, but none of them shows its back or its annexe, the Van

                     der Riet House, now gone. There are numerous records of the front of Grosvenor
                     House,  taken  at  various  dates,  but  none  of  its  back  or  outbuildings.  Another

                     farmhouse to have vanished is Saxenburg, unique in so many respects; Elliott took

                     several  photographs  of  it,  even  of  the  back,  but  this  time  it is  the  front  gable,  an
                     unusual one, which is not clearly shown.



                     A last word about the Elliott Collection as it exists now and how its usefulness could
                     be increased. It should be noted at the outset that not all the photographs Elliott took

                     are in the Collection. Several good architectural shots of which there are no negatives
                     appear  in  books  like  Fairbridge’s.  Perhaps  these  could  be  re-photographed  and

                     included. An index of the Collection does exist, but could be much improved. Good
                     prints  of  all  negatives  in  numerical  order  are  easily  accessible  for  inspection,  but

                     unless one is looking for a specific object such as somebody’s portrait or the gateway

                     of some or other farm, the study of a general subject usually involves having to go
                     through all ten thousand photographs. At present there is less system in the collection

                     than there can ever have been during Elliott’s lifetime. Perhaps the present negative
                     numbers could be regarded as provisional ones, and the whole collection re-arranged

                     into  two  main  categories:  original  photographs  (with  sub-categories  like  furniture,
                     architecture, shipping, portraits) and reproductions (documents, paintings, etc.). On a

                     card  index  or  on  the  backs  of  the  prints  any  information  that  may  be  or  become

                     available (date, date exhibited, catalogue notes etc.) should be provided. Any system
                     would  in  fact  mean  an  improvement  and  would  be  worth  the  effort:  the  Elliott
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21