Page 109 - KBHA BULLETIN 4
P. 109

106


               Some of the names on the list of affected properties are ticked off. These are owners whose

               properties  were  subsequently  bought  by  a  member  of  the  right  racial  group.  Other  names
               remain on the list, however, and these are the people who for various reasons managed to stay

               in Kalk Bay despite continuous threats by the CDB.


               In the fifteen years before the rescinding of the proclamation, a total of some 120 individuals
               – around twenty-two families, one quarter of the fishing community at the time – had to leave

               Kalk Bay as a result of the proclamation. Out of these, nine were property-owning families,

               and some thirteen families were tenants. Not included in this number are the cases in which
               disqualified owners were forced to sell property in Kalk Bay in which they were not resident.

               For example, there was the case of Dominion Theatres, on the corner of Main / Colyn roads,

               which was sold under the GAA in 1970. Also not included in this number are families who
               left  as a consequence of the 1964 announcement  that Kalk  Bay was  to  be ‘zoned’ by the

               GADB.


               Usually, when the original owner of an affected property passed away, the CDB took action
               and prevented the remaining family from inheriting the house. The widow or widower was

               required to leave the property within a year, and in the meantime apply for a permit to remain

               in the house whilst looking for alternative accommodation. He or she would also have to pay
               rent to the new owner, since the property was usually sold before they were able to move out.


               In one case, a Kalk Bay family avoided the inevitable eviction that followed the passing away

               of the owner by simply declining to register the owner’s death. For some eighteen years the
               house remained registered in the name of the deceased person. The strategy worked, and the

               family  still  owns  the  house.  It  meant,  however,  among  other  inconveniences,  that  during

               those years the family was unable to take a loan on the property in order to upgrade it.


               One belief that I came across during my interviews is the idea that people who moved under

               the  GAA  did  so  more  or  less  willingly,  wishing  to  leave  their  dilapidated  houses  for
               something better. To some extent this is true – some of the cottages were crowded and badly

               maintained, and some of those who moved tell me that they are indeed more content where
               they now live. These are exceptions, however. For most, leaving Kalk Bay was traumatic,

               and involved an abrupt severing of deeply felt social and historical connections, both to the
               community and to the landscape itself.



                                                           106
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114