Page 38 - KBHA BULLETIN 2
P. 38

35


               In  addition  to  these  and  other  examples  of  ecological  succession, a major factor initiating

               changes in the Bay has been overexploitation. This is clear in the case of the edible fishes but
               this  is  also  true  of a number of rocky-shore invertebrates. In Gilchrist’s day, red bait was

               abundant  along  the  whole  of  the  lower  shore;  now  it  is  only  to  be  found  in  relatively

               inaccessible places. As far as sandy beaches are concerned, the most exploited animal has
               been  the  white  sand  mussel  Donax.  Where  they  are  not  exploited,  sand  mussels  attain

               enormous densities until they are packed tight, squeezed up against one another; but in False

               Bay those days are long gone and the population is very sparse.



               False Bay’s sandy beaches have in fact possibly suffered more from human activity than have

               its rocky shores. There are many reasons for this but in recent years a prime reason has been

               the  cleaning  of  the  beaches  by  municipal  workers.  Well,  I  suppose  holiday  makers  and
               tourists are entitled to have clean beaches but the trouble is that removing all debris, including

               marine algae, jellyfish and the like, deprives the intertidal community of its food. This has led

               to a dramatic decline in many species. Added to this has been the levelling of dunes and the
               hardening of surfaces in the provision of sub-economic housing and recreational facilities. As

               a result of this, one of my favourite animals, an isopod named Tylos, is now extinct in False

               Bay. There were plenty of them when I first studied the beaches between Muizenberg and
               Strandfontein in the 1960s but not one has been seen for the last 25 years.




               So what of pollution? I undertook a pollution survey of False Bay in 1988/89, summarising

               all the literature and performing analyses of the water at various points. We found the water
               from  Cape  Point  north  to  Muizenberg  corner  to  be  virtually  unpolluted  by  international

               standards. Sure, there is some input and an occasional accident that leads to pollution but on

               the whole the biota remains unaffected. Things begin to change along the stretch of shore
               between  Muizenberg  and  Strandfontein, there being quite considerable organic enrichment

               from  places  such  as  Zandvlei  and  the  outfall  from  the  Strandfontein  sewage  works.  This

               organic enrichment leads to phytoplankton blooms in the surf - hence the patches of brown
               water. These brown phytoplankton patches present no hazard at all either to human health or

               to marine life, but they are unsightly and put many visitors off swimming.
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43